Ajit Agarkar's Absence Sparks Speculation at BCCI Meeting
Ajit Agarkar was missing from Mumbai on Thursday, and that was all it took.
A high-powered review meeting in his hometown, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) top brass in attendance, big decisions under discussion – and the chairman of selectors nowhere in sight. In a system obsessed with optics, the empty chair did the talking.
The BCCI moved quickly to douse the fire.
“Today, he was out of station, so he could not be a part of the meeting. The meeting was called at very short notice, and our chairman of the selection committee, Ajit, was not in town. So he could not join the meeting, and he was in an area where he could not join online either, despite our best efforts,” BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia said.
On paper, that should have been the end of it. A scheduling clash, poor connectivity, case closed.
Only it wasn’t.
Just days earlier, Agarkar had chaired an online selection committee meeting to pick the T20I squad for the three-match series against Afghanistan. The same man who could convene a digital meeting to select a squad suddenly could not be reached online for a high-stakes review in Mumbai. The contrast fed the speculation.
Saikia, though, drew a firm line.
“Today, we did not have any selection meeting. There was no such discussion in today’s meeting,” he stated, making it clear that Thursday’s gathering was not about picking teams or reshaping the selection panel.
That did little to slow down the noise outside. Social media timelines quickly filled with theories about Agarkar’s future. Some handles went as far as claiming he was on his way out, turning an absence into an impending exit.
The BCCI secretary’s words left little room for creative interpretation, yet the curiosity around Agarkar refused to fade. His position has been under the microscope ever since the Rohit Sharma episode, when selectors reportedly asked the former captain to retire, only for the board to step in. That flashpoint put the selection committee’s authority and alignment with the BCCI firmly under scrutiny.
For now, the official line is stability. Agarkar is currently said to be overseas, and multiple sources maintain that no changes are on the horizon for the selection committee. He is expected to complete his term, which runs until next July. There is even talk that he could receive an extension through to the World Cup in October–November 2027, though that possibility has not been independently confirmed.
Saikia, for his part, made it clear he would not feed the rumour mill. “I do not want to give any fodder to the speculators,” he said, pushing back against attempts to read drama into an itinerary and a patchy internet connection.
The immediate signs point towards business as usual. Agarkar is expected to be in Chennai for the Duleep Trophy final starting September 6, a five-day red-ball fixture where he is likely to be joined by a couple of fellow selectors. Two other members of the panel are set to be on duty in Delhi for the T20I series against Afghanistan, splitting responsibilities across formats and venues as the domestic and international calendars overlap.
Agarkar has hardly been operating in the shadows. During the recently concluded Test series in Sri Lanka, television cameras picked him out repeatedly, tracking his reactions in the stands as closely as the action in the middle. His presence was constant, his influence obvious.
On Thursday, he was just as central to the story – this time without a single frame on screen.






