logo

Sanju Samson's 57: Handling Pressure with Emotional Intelligence

Sanju Samson walked out in Delhi with five international failures clinging to him like a second skin. A teenager was breathing down his neck for a top-order spot, social media had turned every dismissal into a meme, and the debate over his place in India’s T20I side had gone from murmurs to a roar.

Twenty-two balls later, the noise sounded very different.

Samson smashed 57 off 22 deliveries against Afghanistan, cracking 52 of those runs in boundaries, and dragged India to a seven-wicket win in the second T20I. It was the kind of innings that doesn’t just change a game; it changes a conversation.

The pressure had been building for weeks. A lean run through the Ireland and England tours, a flight home from England with more questions than answers, and then the added sting of watching Vaibhav Sooryavanshi impress on the Zimbabwe tour while he himself was left out completely. Selection meetings had turned into a running referendum on Samson.

On Tuesday night, he offered his own response. Not in words. In clean, ruthless strokes.

“I try to switch the Wi‑Fi off”

Only after the job was done did Samson let people in on what it actually feels like to bat with that kind of scrutiny humming in the background.

“I try to switch the Wi‑Fi off,” he said, explaining how he deals with the relentless stream of opinions that chase every failure. The metaphor was light, almost playful, but the reality behind it is anything but.

Sometimes the Wi‑Fi comes back on. Comments pop up. A senior player says something. A pundit dissects a shot. A clip goes viral. Samson didn’t pretend he’s oblivious to any of it.

“Definitely, outside noise does affect cricketers in India,” he admitted. No bravado. No stock line about blocking it all out.

That honesty cut through more sharply than any six.

He spoke about clarity instead: clarity of mindset, clarity in preparation, clarity about how he wants to play. The work, he suggested, happens long before he takes guard. If he lets every opinion bleed into his thinking, the bat would feel heavier with every ball.

“I’m not a machine. We are not robots”

This is where Samson broke from the script Indian athletes are often expected to follow.

He didn’t claim to be unshakeable. He didn’t roll out the usual clichés about mental toughness. He acknowledged the sting.

“Earlier, it used to hurt a little. I'm not a machine. We are not robots that we can say, ‘No, it doesn't affect me.’ Definitely, it affects you,” he said.

That line matters. Players are routinely painted as if they live above the fray, immune to trolls, TV panels and WhatsApp forwards. Samson quietly dismantled that myth.

He went on to explain the real cost of letting criticism seep into his game. If he carried every comment to the crease, he said, he would second-guess every stroke.

Before each shot, the mind would race: “Yaar, out ho gaya toh phir Wi‑Fi problem ho jayega.” If that loop starts, freedom disappears. So he counters it with something simple, almost stubborn in its calm: “Koi baat nahi.”

No problem. Play the ball. Live with the result.

That’s not detachment. It’s discipline.

A selection battle, and a shift in tone

Samson’s innings in Delhi doesn’t end the selection debate with Sooryavanshi, but it does tilt the scales. For weeks, the younger man’s form on the Zimbabwe tour had fed into a narrative that Samson’s window might be closing.

Now, the conversation has to factor in a different image: Samson, under pressure, clearing his head and tearing into Afghanistan’s attack with the kind of fluency that suggests a player who still believes he belongs at this level.

He made it clear that experience has taught him how to live with the scrutiny rather than pretend it doesn’t exist. That, he suggested, is where maturity shows itself: not in being untouched by criticism, but in knowing how to carry it without letting it paralyse you.

A new kind of example

In Indian sport, vulnerability is often treated as a flaw to be hidden. Samson walked into the press conference and did the opposite.

He didn’t sell a fantasy of invulnerability. He offered something far more useful to the next generation watching: you will hear the noise, it will hurt at times, and you can still perform.

The “Wi‑Fi” line will stick because it captures modern cricket’s reality with uncomfortable accuracy. Every player is permanently connected, every mistake instantly replayed and judged. The real skill is not pretending the signal doesn’t reach you; it’s knowing when to switch it off.

On a night when his bat finally drowned out the critics, Samson did something rarer still. He showed that behind the numbers and narratives, behind the selection battles and social media storms, there’s a cricketer who feels every bit of it—and has learned to play freely anyway.

For India, that’s more than a match-winning 57. It’s a reminder that in a game obsessed with stats and strike-rates, the sharpest edge might still be emotional intelligence.